The Minnesota Supreme Court today scheduled oral argument in State v. Brooks, for September 11, 2013. This case will likely address whether Minnesota’s Implied Consent law is constitutional and/or whether or not a DWI suspects ‘consent’ to take a blood, breath or urine test after being informed that they are required by law to take said test and it is a crime if they do not take said test, is valid consent pursuant to the 4th Amendment.
DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this article does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Please contact attorney Kirk Anderson for an initial consultation.